If you don't need the power of a dedicated Diff tool application, the integrated diff views in Tower might be absolutely sufficient for you: I can already confirm that all of the mentioned tools work seamlessly at least with Tower, our own Git client. In case you're looking for a free alternative to the standard FileMerge app, you should also have a look at P4Merge and DiffMerge.īoth can't compare in terms of features and user interface with their commercial competitors - but make for a valid alternative on macOS, Windows, and Linux.Īnother aspect to watch out for is integrations: before choosing your favorite tool, you should make sure that it plays nicely with the rest of your tool chain. Kaleidoscope is also available for the iPad. Its beautiful user interface and great image diffing capabilities are what set it apart. owners) multiple times, Kaleidoscope is still one of the best diff & merge tools for the Mac. KaleidoscopeĪlthough it has changed hands (i.e. DeltaWalker supports macOS, Windows and Linux. Also, if you're regularly performing comparisons on a folder basis, DeltaWalker shines with a great performance in this area. However, it goes one step further by letting you compare file archives like ZIP, JAR, and TAR files. Just like Araxis, the DeltaWalker app also lets you compare office files. In both the Working Copy and various History / Changeset views, you can now see the actual images - and how they were changed! Try it yourself - for free! DeltaWalker This research exemplifies ‘Research through Art’ applied in the context of experience design for tangible, wearable and social interaction.NEW: Image Diffing in Tower! Our popular Git client Tower now supports Image Diffing for a variety of formats (including PNG, JPG, GIF, BMP, TIFF, JPEG2000, and HEIC). Case Studies provide evidence in the form of rigorously documented design processes that illustrate these strategies. The subsequent application of these strategies is examined through a series of interactive art installations that employ embodied interaction as a central expression of technology. The analysis results in a set of design strategies based in embodied practices within Somatics and Performance. This is examined by comparing theories and practices of embodied experience between HCI and Somatics (Performance) and analyzing influences, values and assumptions underlying epistemological frameworks. Differing epistemologies and their resulting approaches to experience identify an under-theorized area of research and an opportunity to develop a richer knowledge and practice base. The contributions of Somatics and Performance to the history of embodiment are not yet fully understood within HCI. This is particularly evident in their histories of knowledge construction and representation. Yet, Somatics and Performance differ from normative HCI in their epistemological frameworks of embodiment. The common ground between HCI and the fields of Somatics and Performance is based on the need to understand and model human experience. Along with phenomenology, cognitive science, psychology and the arts, recent interdisciplinary contributions to HCI include the knowledge-rich domains of Somatics and Performance that carry long-standing traditions of embodied practice. The enduring need to interact through experience has spawned a variety of interdisciplinary bridging strategies in the hope of gaining deeper understanding of human experience. Its growing recognition and value is evidenced in part by a remarkable increase in systems design and publication focusing on various aspects of Embodiment. THE VARIETIES OF USER EXPERIENCE: BRIDGING EMBODIED METHODOLOGIES FROM SOMATICS AND PERFORMANCE TO HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION ABSTRACT: Embodied Interaction continues to gain significance within the field of Human Computer Interaction (HCI).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |